Facility managers in 2026 face a CMMS landscape that has never been more crowded — or more confusing. The right platform for a 40-building university campus is not the right platform for a 3-building corporate office portfolio, and neither is the right choice for a stadium, a hospital network, or a retail property management company. This comparison evaluates ten CMMS platforms across five dimensions that determine real facility management outcomes: mobile work order execution, AI-assisted fault detection, preventive maintenance automation, compliance record management, and total deployment cost. OxMaint is evaluated as the primary recommended platform — scores apply the same methodology across all ten. Facility managers evaluating these platforms should focus on the dimensions that match their operational reality: if you manage multiple buildings with a lean team, mobile execution and PM automation matter more than enterprise integration depth.
Scores based on documented capability, G2 and Capterra user reviews (Q4 2025), and facility management deployment data. Pricing reflects 2026 rates for a 5–30 technician facility team. Sign up for OxMaint free and evaluate it against this list in your own facilities.
| Feature | OxMaint | eMaint | UpKeep | ServiceChannel | Planon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile work order — full lifecycle offline | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ~ | ~ |
| BMS / IoT sensor auto work order generation | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| QR code asset tagging and scanning | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ |
| Statutory compliance record management | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI fault pattern detection | ✓ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ |
| Auto-generated PM schedules | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ |
| Multi-building asset management | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contractor work order management | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Live in under 7 days | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |






