A contractor can look reliable on paper and still arrive late, leave rework behind, or skip a safety step that nobody recorded. This contractor performance scorecard checklist gives municipal inspectors, supervisors, and procurement staff one 52-point list to complete for every job. Each item names the evidence to attach, so results hold up when a renewal, payment, or dispute is questioned. Print it, copy it into your own form, or run it digitally in inspection and work order software.
Contractor Performance Scorecard Checklist for Municipalities
A complete job-by-job checklist covering onboarding, timeliness, quality, rework, safety, and invoicing, with scoring rules and a sign-off block.
How to Use This Checklist
Complete one checklist per job or per reporting period. Section A is done once per vendor; sections B to F are completed at job closeout.
Section A: Vendor Onboarding and Contract Setup
Complete before the first assignment and refresh whenever documents expire. Not scored per job.
- Scorecard criteria and weights are attached to the solicitation or contract.Evidence: contract exhibit
- Business and trade licenses are verified and current. CriticalEvidence: license copies with expiry dates
- Certificate of insurance matches required coverage types and limits. CriticalEvidence: certificate on file
- Required worker certifications are confirmed for the trade.Evidence: certification list
- Subcontractors are disclosed and held to the same requirements.Evidence: subcontractor list
- Response time and completion targets are written into the agreement.Evidence: scope or service levels
- Vendor contact and after-hours number are recorded.Evidence: vendor record
- Safety, traffic control, and permit expectations are communicated in writing.Evidence: kickoff notes
- Eligibility checks required by local policy are completed.Evidence: procurement file
- Vendor has been briefed on scoring and the dispute process.Evidence: briefing record
Section B: Dispatch and Timeliness (Weight 25%)
Use timestamps from the work order rather than memory. Separate delays the vendor caused from delays the city caused.
- Work order lists asset, location, scope, and priority before dispatch.Evidence: work order
- Request time and vendor acknowledgment time are recorded.Evidence: timestamps
- Vendor responded within the agreed window.Evidence: response time
- Arrival or start time is logged.Evidence: check-in or inspector note
- Any delay was reported before the deadline with a reason.Evidence: message or note
- Delay cause is classified as vendor, city, or external.Evidence: classification on order
- Completion date met the agreed date.Evidence: completion timestamp
- After-hours or emergency calls were answered as the contract requires.Evidence: call log
Stop re-typing this checklist for every job
Run inspections, photos, timestamps, and vendor work orders in one place with Oxmaint, so scores come from records.
Section C: Quality of Work and Inspection (Weight 25%)
Inspect against the written specification, not against personal preference.
- Work matches the specification and approved materials.Evidence: spec and inspection form
- An inspector visited the site before sign-off.Evidence: inspector name and date
- Inspection form is complete with pass or fail for each item.Evidence: completed form
- Before and after photos are attached.Evidence: photos on work order
- Materials used match submittals or approved equivalents.Evidence: delivery tickets
- Site is clean and debris is removed.Evidence: closeout photo
- Punch list items are listed with due dates.Evidence: punch list
- Punch list items were closed within the agreed period.Evidence: closure dates
- Work passed first inspection without correction.Evidence: inspection result
- Asset was tested and left in working order.Evidence: test record
Section D: Rework and Warranty (Weight 20%)
Check asset history first. Repeat visits for the same defect are the clearest sign of a workmanship problem.
- Asset history shows no repeat visit for the same defect.Evidence: asset history
- Warranty start and end dates are recorded.Evidence: warranty record
- Warranty callbacks were completed at no cost to the city.Evidence: callback order
- Cause of any repeat failure was reviewed.Evidence: review note
- Vendor answered warranty requests within the agreed time.Evidence: request and response dates
- Rework hours and cost are recorded separately.Evidence: cost lines
- Disputed repairs are documented with photos.Evidence: dispute file
Section E: Safety and Compliance (Weight 20%)
A single No on a critical item requires review, even if the section percentage is high.
- Crew wore required protective equipment.Evidence: site check
- Work zone or traffic control matched the approved plan. CriticalEvidence: photo and plan
- Lockout and tagout were followed where applicable. CriticalEvidence: lockout record
- Required permits were obtained and posted.Evidence: permit copies
- Utility locates were completed before digging. CriticalEvidence: locate ticket
- No incident occurred, or it was reported the same day.Evidence: incident log
- Barriers and signage protected the public and staff.Evidence: site photo
- Hazardous materials were handled and disposed of per rules.Evidence: disposal record
- Site was left safe with no open hazards.Evidence: closeout check
Section F: Communication, Invoicing, and Records (Weight 10%)
Clean paperwork saves finance and audit time. Check the invoice against the approved scope before payment.
- Vendor provided status updates at the agreed points.Evidence: messages
- Completion report describes the work performed.Evidence: report
- Invoice references the purchase order and work order.Evidence: invoice
- Invoice amounts match approved scope, rates, and quantities.Evidence: invoice review
- Change orders were approved in writing before work began.Evidence: signed change order
- Timesheets or material receipts support time-and-material billing.Evidence: attachments
- Manuals, as-built details, and warranty papers were delivered.Evidence: closeout package
- Invoice was submitted within the agreed period.Evidence: invoice date
Scoring: From Ticks to a Final Rating
Convert each section percentage to a 1 to 5 score, then apply the weights. The cut points below are a starting suggestion; adjust them with your procurement office.
| Section percentage of Yes | Score | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 95% to 100% | 5 | Exceeds requirements |
| 85% to 94% | 4 | Meets requirements with minor issues |
| 70% to 84% | 3 | Acceptable, needed follow-up |
| 50% to 69% | 2 | Below requirements |
| Below 50% | 1 | Unacceptable |
Final score formula
Add the five results for the final rating out of 5. Any critical item marked No sends the job to manager review regardless of the total.
Sign-Off Block
Copy this block to the end of your printed or digital form.
What to Do With the Result
Score 4.0 and above
- Send results to the vendor
- Consider for repeat work where rules allow
- Keep as a benchmark for others
Score 2.5 to 3.9
- Meet the vendor on the lowest sections
- Agree dated corrective actions
- Recheck on the next two jobs
Below 2.5 or critical No
- Notify procurement and legal as needed
- Hold new assignments pending review
- Document every step taken
Tips for Using the Checklist in the Field
- Print on one double-sided sheet per job, with the sign-off block on the back.
- Complete sections B and F from the office and sections C and E on site.
- Take photos while on site, not afterward, so evidence matches the date.
- Use the same inspector pair for a few weeks to calibrate how strictly items are marked.
- Review a sample of finished checklists monthly and correct unclear items.
- Remove or add items by trade. Roofing needs warranty detail; grounds work needs schedule detail.
Running the Checklist Digitally With Oxmaint
Paper works for a pilot. As volume grows, a maintenance system removes duplicate entry and keeps evidence attached.
To set up your own template, book a demo and bring a copy of your current form.
Trade Add-On Items
Add the lines below to sections C and D when the job falls in one of these trades. They cover the failures that most often appear after the contractor has left.
Paving, patching, and concrete
- Surface was prepared and edges were cut or cleaned before patching.Evidence: photo or inspector note
- Material temperature and compaction followed the specification.Evidence: delivery ticket or test result
- Patch is flush with the surrounding surface and drains properly.Evidence: closeout photo
- Patch was rechecked after the first wet or freezing period.Evidence: follow-up inspection
HVAC, electrical, and plumbing service
- Technician held the license or certification the task requires.Evidence: license record
- Readings, settings, or test results were recorded after the repair.Evidence: service report
- Parts replaced are listed with model and serial numbers.Evidence: invoice or report
- Old parts or failed components were available for review when requested.Evidence: inspector note
Grounds, landscaping, and roofing
- Scheduled visits happened on the contracted dates.Evidence: visit log
- Chemical applications were logged with product, rate, and applicator.Evidence: application record
- Roof or envelope repairs were photographed before covering.Evidence: photo set
- Warranty letter or manufacturer registration was delivered.Evidence: closeout package
Program Manager Checklist: Monthly Review
Individual job sheets only help when someone reviews them together. Use this short list once a month.
- Every completed vendor job in the month has a finished checklist.Evidence: job list compared with checklists
- Checklists with a critical No have a documented manager review.Evidence: review notes
- Any score of 2 or below was reviewed by a second person.Evidence: reviewer initials
- Contractors with falling scores have been contacted.Evidence: message or meeting record
- Expired insurance, licenses, or certifications have been identified and addressed.Evidence: compliance report
- Repeat repairs have been traced to the vendor responsible.Evidence: asset history
- Results have been shared with department heads.Evidence: monthly summary
Why a Checklist Beats Memory and Email
Consistency
- Every vendor is judged on the same items
- Two inspectors reach similar results
- New staff learn the standard quickly
Defensibility
- Each answer points to a record
- Disputes are settled with evidence
- Audit questions have ready answers
Speed
- Scoring takes minutes, not meetings
- Problems surface while jobs are fresh
- Trends appear without extra reports
Mistakes to Avoid When Scoring
- Ticking items from memory instead of checking the record, which makes the score a guess.
- Marking N/A too often, which inflates percentages by shrinking the denominator.
- Blaming the vendor for delays the city caused, such as late site access or missing approvals.
- Ignoring a critical No because the overall average looks healthy.
- Keeping completed sheets in a drawer where procurement and finance cannot use them.
- Never updating the list, so new risks and new contract terms are not captured.
Frequently Asked Questions
Turn this checklist into a habit your whole team follows
Complete inspections on mobile, keep vendor evidence with each work order, and score contractors from real records.







