EASA Part 145 vs FAA Part 43: Best Documentation Mapping Guide

By William Jerry on September 22, 2026

easa-part-145-vs-faa-part-43-documentation-guide

A mixed-fleet MRO doesn't have one records problem — it has two, and they disagree on the shape of the answer. EASA Part 145 wants organisational approval, quality-system evidence and CRS entries tied to certifying staff numbers. FAA 14 CFR Part 43 wants return-to-service records tied to A&P/IA credentials in a very different format. Every airframe that touches both regimes needs the same event captured twice — or captured once and mapped to both. This guide walks the mapping using OXMAINT AI, the AI-powered CMMS for dual-regulator MROs.

Aviation MRO · Dual-Regulator Records · EASA / FAA Mapping

One Maintenance Event. Two Regulators. One Record System.

OXMAINT AI, the AI-powered CMMS/maintenance management software, connects the full workflow on one platform — inspections and defects in, work orders assigned to certifying staff, and every record captured once and mapped to both EASA Part 145 and FAA Part 43 field sets.

Dual-Format Record Capture Certifying-Staff Traceability CRS & RTS on One Record
2 Regimes
on the same airframe — different formats, same underlying work
7 Fields
shared across EASA and FAA record requirements
4 Roles
carrying certifying authority — A&P, IA, Part 145 CS, Part 66 B1/B2
1 Event
captured once, mapped to CRS and RTS formats on demand

The Regulatory Frame — Same Work, Different Language

Both regimes want to know who did the work, on what, when, and to what standard. They just ask in different words with different attached authority. OXMAINT AI holds one record and formats the output for each. Sign up free and set up dual-format capture in OXMAINT AI.

EASA
Part 145
Organisational approval
  • Approval held by the organisation, not the individual
  • Certifying Staff (CS) named under the approval
  • Certificate of Release to Service (CRS) closes the task
  • Quality system + safety management required
  • Part 66 licence tied to CS authorisation
FAA
14 CFR Part 43
Individual & repair-station authority
  • Individual mechanic (A&P) or IA authority
  • Repair Stations approved under Part 145 (US)
  • Return to Service (RTS) entry closes the task
  • Maintenance record content spec in §43.9 / §43.11
  • Signature + certificate number + date required

The 7-Field Shared Record Set

Underneath the terminology, both regimes need the same seven pieces of evidence for every task. OXMAINT AI captures them once at the point of work — every downstream export inherits the same source. Book a demo to see one record produce both formats.

1
Aircraft / Component ID
Reg / MSN, ATA chapter, part number, serial number
2
Task Reference
AMM / CMM / SB / AD / EO paragraph reference
3
Description of Work
What was done, findings, replacements, adjustments
4
Date & Time
Server timestamp — non-editable, timezone-stamped
5
Certifying Signature
CS stamp / A&P cert number — role-typed to the regime
6
Approval Authority
Part 145 approval number OR Repair Station cert OR individual A&P
7
Closure Statement
CRS text (EASA) OR RTS entry text (FAA) — auto-formatted per regime

The Field-by-Field Mapping Table

The mapping isn't complicated — but it has to be consistent. Every EASA field has a Part 43 counterpart, and every audit needs to trace back to the same source event. OXMAINT AI ships this mapping as a default template. Start free and use the default mapping in OXMAINT AI.

Shared FieldEASA Part 145FAA 14 CFR Part 43
Approval authorityPart 145 approval no.Repair Station cert / A&P cert no.
Signatory roleCertifying Staff (Part 66)A&P mechanic / IA / Rep Stn
Task standardAMM, CMM, EASA AD, SBAMM, CMM, FAA AD, SB
Closure statementCRS: "Certifies that the work specified…"RTS: signature + cert no. + date
Life-limited partsEASA Form 1 / dual-release Form 1FAA 8130-3 / dual-release 8130-3
Defects deferredMEL/CDL applied · deferred defect logMEL/CDL applied · discrepancy record
Quality systemMOE required · audit trailRSM/RSQM required · audit trail

One Event. Two Regulators. Zero Double Entry.

OXMAINT AI captures the work once and formats it for CRS or RTS on demand — so a mixed-fleet MRO stops paying the tax of duplicate records.

Who Can Sign What — Roles & Authority

Signatory authority is where dual-regulator MROs stumble most often. An A&P alone can't sign a CRS. A Part 66 CS can't sign a US RTS on a Part 43 airframe. OXMAINT AI ties every certifying signature to the correct role and blocks the wrong one. Book a demo to see role-gated signatures live.

A&P
FAA Airframe & Powerplant
Individual authority under Part 65. Signs RTS on Part 43 work within scope. Cannot sign EASA CRS.
IA
FAA Inspection Authorization
A&P + IA extension. Approves annual inspections and major repairs/alterations under Part 43.
CS B1/B2
EASA Part 66 Certifying Staff
Individual licence held; certifying authority delegated by the Part 145 organisation for CRS.
RS
Repair Station / Part 145 Org
Organisational approval carrying the ratings — the umbrella under which individual signatures act.

The Dual-Release Workflow — When One Form Isn't Enough

A component leaving an MRO for both EASA and FAA jurisdictions often needs a dual-release Form 1 / 8130-3. OXMAINT AI holds the release history against the part and generates the correct release document based on destination. Sign up free and set up dual releases in OXMAINT AI.

01
Work carried out on component
Task recorded once with 7-field set on the part's asset record
▼
02
Destination declared
EASA-only, FAA-only, or dual — declared before release doc generation
▼
03
Release form generated
EASA Form 1, FAA 8130-3, or dual-signed form — auto-populated from the source record
▼
04
Signed & locked
Certifying staff signature + approval number attached; release retained on part for full life

The Audit Test — What Each Regulator Asks For

The mapping only matters if it survives an audit. Each regulator has a different question set — OXMAINT AI's audit portal answers both from the same source records. Book a demo to see the audit portal live.

EASA Audit Questions
Is the Certifying Staff current and authorised for this scope?
Does the CRS statement match the required text?
Is the MOE reflected in the actual workflow?
Are deferred defects reviewed within the MEL window?
Is the quality feedback loop closing findings?
FAA Audit Questions
Does the RTS entry have signature, cert number and date?
Is the work traceable to AMM / SB / AD?
Are life-limited parts on 8130-3 with dual release where applicable?
Is the RSM/RSQM current and followed?
Are §43.9 / §43.11 record contents complete?

What OXMAINT AI Gives a Dual-Regulator MRO

Built for the mixed-fleet reality — one platform behind both regulators, one record behind both audits, one workflow that stops the double-entry tax. Start free and configure your dual-format capture in OXMAINT AI.

7-Field Shared Record
One capture at the point of work — every downstream export inherits the same source.
Dual-Format Output
CRS (EASA) and RTS (FAA) closure statements auto-formatted from the same event.
Role-Gated Signatures
A&P, IA, CS B1/B2 and Repair Station roles matched to the right regime — wrong signatures blocked.
Life-Limited Part Trace
EASA Form 1 / FAA 8130-3 / dual-release forms generated from the part's release history.
Cert Currency Ledger
A&P, IA and Part 66 currency tracked per user; expired staff blocked from signing.
Regulator-Scoped Audit Portal
Read-only accounts scoped to EASA or FAA question sets — no export scramble.
"

We used to keep two records for every task on our dual-registered airframes — one in the CRS binder, one in the RTS log. When they diverged (as they always did), the auditor found it. Moving to one source with two outputs eliminated the divergence entirely. The last EASA audit and the last FAA audit both drew from the same records.

Quality Manager · Mixed-Fleet MRO, Europe & US

Frequently Asked Questions

Does OXMAINT AI generate EASA Form 1 and FAA 8130-3 directly?
Yes — release forms populate from the source record's 7 fields and route for certifying-staff signature. Dual-release variants generate when the destination is declared. Sign up free and generate your first release.
How does the platform handle an EASA-only or FAA-only task?
Task templates are typed by regime. A single-regime task uses the appropriate closure statement only; a dual-regime task carries both. Your team chooses at task creation. Book a demo to see task typing live.
Can auditors from EASA and FAA both use the audit portal?
Yes — separate read-only accounts scope each auditor to their regime's records, questions and formats. Every query is logged for chain-of-custody. Start free and configure auditor scopes.
What about MOE and RSM/RSQM documents — are those in scope?
The platform holds the reference document links and cross-checks that workflows match what those manuals declare. Revision tracking flags when the manual updates. Book a demo to see MOE / RSQM linkage.
How long does it take to migrate our existing records?
Most MROs run parallel for one quarter — new records land in OXMAINT AI, legacy records queried in place. Full migration typically completes in 90–120 days depending on volume. Sign up free and start the parallel run.

Capture the Work Once. Answer Both Regulators.

Move your MRO records onto OXMAINT AI — one 7-field capture, dual-format output, role-gated signatures and a scoped audit portal for each regime.


Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!